Leaving the NAR Church: Angela’s story

“The senior pastor himself was declared as an apostle by an Elijah List prophetess, and that his church would be known as the “loving church.” Armed with this fresh knowledge, the church became fanatical in making that prophecy happen.”

Angela’s family member was beginning to see some strange red flags in his church. Having “apostles” and “prophets” in your church is a sure sign that your leadership has officially embraced the New Apostolic Reformation – even if they deny that they have.

In this series, I want to take readers beyond the textbook What is the New Apostolic Reformation Movement explanation, into the personal experiences from those who have been there, and what happened when God opened their eyes to the truth.

Here is Angela’s story about her family member’s departure from an NAR church:

In 2006, a family member started re-attending a church near their home. At first glimpse, it appeared to be a normal, bible believing church, but in the ensuing months to come, it turned out to be deceptively more than what originally met the eye.

The senior pastor was affiliated with the Assemblies of God of which has strong ties to NAR. He seemed to be genuine in wanting to reach the lost and to teach his congregation in the Word of God. As time passed, he became more absorbed in doing ministry work for the upper elites of the Assemblies of God and leaving his church to lesser, unversed leadership. He was fast becoming the rising star in NAR circles as the golden boy who saved a dying church in that area and brought it back to life.

While the pastor was trying to build a name for himself through A/G leadership elites, discipleship was at a nill, but the promoting of being in ministry was huge and in “finding your destiny” in the body of Christ. However, in promoting these two aspects, the leadership aimed it at the under 30 crowd, alienating the older generation in the church. They wanted the younger crowd for leadership roles in their small groups, not the older members within the church. The church leaders could “control” them versus the older members.

As an example, my family member who was operating in multiple minor ministries was stopped by the associate, 30 something, pastor in a hallway in the church.  He said they had a recent monthly ministerial leader meeting and determined that this older family member was in too many ministries and the church leadership relieved them of their duties to each ministry. Needless to say, this made my family member feel alienated and useless.

Another point of error that was rising up in this church was the apostle and prophet sector. Certain individuals in the church who were self-proclaimed prophets and who had garnered the pastor’s attention were given license to speak their prophecies by the pastor.

Furthermore, they had self-proclaimed international apostles and prophets speak at their church. At one point, the senior pastor himself was declared as an apostle by an Elijah List prophetess, and that his church would be known as the “loving church”. Armed with this fresh knowledge, the church became fanatical in making that prophecy happen.

This “loving church” operated in a false, stifling, manipulative love. As an example, if one was sick and out of church for a while, they would “love bomb” the person with calls and visits. Now to the average person that would seem all right, but the twist was that while doing this they would pressure the person as to when you were coming back and why the person did not have enough faith to believe in their healing. Furthermore, the people who were assigned to “check up” on you, would report to the leadership as to what was going on with that person.

The church leadership including the pastor, would tell the congregation that if they were teaching in error, you could go to them and “talk” to them about it. This was far from the truth because those that confronted the leadership on error were either chastised and humiliated by them or were forced to leave the church. And if it was perceived by church leadership that someone was attempting to leave quietly over a perceived false teaching, the church would send people to “talk” to you about it. Furthermore, the person leaving was used as an example by church leadership of someone who was in rebellion of their teachings and that they were opening themselves up destruction by the devil.

In closing, my family member started questioning more and more the teachings and going ons in that church.  Through the discerning power of the Holy Spirit through God’s Word, they left quietly in the summer of 2013. The church continued to harass them for almost a solid year with their mindbending, controlling “love.” Hence, the Lord is still healing and restoring them through His Word and with the prayers of the true faithful in Christ Jesus, including me.


Author’s Note:  You can read the entire series of NAR testimonies here.  If you would like to send me your story about your NAR church experience and what happened when your eyes were opened, you can email me here. I will be changing your first name to keep you anonymous.

 

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Berean Research Articles, Leaving the NAR Church and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Leaving the NAR Church: Angela’s story

  1. Cindy L says:

    This is very similar to my story. We need to test everything that we encounter in churches these days. When a group or guest speaker is brought in, especially when they have use titles such as “apostle” or “bishop”, do some research on them – they don’t usually offer up this info too freely. In our case, we found they proudly proclaimed their “anointed” status right on their church’s website, including their head organization, an international NAR training center in another state. But out of 200 people in our former church, we were the only family to show concern and speak up. Our questions were not welcome and were not answered, so we left. Other red flags we saw, in retrospect, were: increasing use of dumbed-down songs and Hillsong music, acceptance of Word of Faith books and studies, and a strong push to “unite” with other churches of very different beliefs for social programs.

    It happens so gradually, like the proverbial frog being boiled in a pot of water. We much be vigilant!

    Like

  2. Manny1962 says:

    If that is not a cult, I don’t know what is! The NAR is insidious, and it’s making headway (through books like The Shack) through churchianity, I still hold one of the greatest fields for evangelizing is “church.”

    Like

  3. Maggie says:

    In my former small non-charismatic church (although it was “purpose driven”), I was aware of four individuals who had obvious NAR leanings. It seemed they were deliberately “seeding” themselves into this church body to have an NAR influence. One tried to start a healing ministry but was rebuffed. I don’t know if this is a widespread plan of the NAR to infiltrate non-charismatic churches or whether it was just the idea of these individuals. The church leadership was at a loss as to how to deal with them. This was one of the issues I brought to the church elders, urging them to educate the congregation about false teaching, which they refused to do. They preferred to shut me up instead.

    Interestingly, a relative of mine who lives across the country told me a similar story about a couple in their mainstream church who spoke favorably about the “Toronto Blessing” and were promoting NAR events coming to their city.

    Like

  4. Manny1962 says:

    Maggie it wouldn’t surprise me, the funding behind the NAR is huge, you also see the RCC behind that, remember 2017 is a year of anniversaries, 500 years of the Reformation, 50 years of Israel recapturing Jerusalem, you also have the Balfour Decleration, it’s also 50 year anniversary of the Catholic Charismatic Renewal, remember this pope sat with the leaders of so called Evangelical Christians​ to discuss unity, it doesn’t take much dot connecting to see where all of this is coming from! 2017 is going to be a year of pushing ecumenism to the.mainstream!

    Like

    • Maggie says:

      Manny, that’s quite a convergence! As I did my initial research, my mind was ready to explode when I saw how the various streams originated and were coming together: purpose driven, hyper-charismatic, emergent. Also, the terminology and goals of the New Age/occult were being used by these same groups.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s