The Left’s continued attack on atonement for sins

First, Brian McLaren denied Jesus’ substitutionary atonement on the cross. A few weeks ago, fellow emergent Tony Jones joined him, as has Jay Bakker.  And now the full-on attack of the truth is sweeping the Left, tickling ears and changing minds and hearts:

atonement
I share this image not to offend, but to ask these questions:  As the progressives continue their intentional deconstruction and all-out attack on the atoning sacrifice Christ made for us on the cross, are you equipped to contend? Will you equip your church? Your children?

Many commenters are weighing in, saying it’s a cool new way to look at Jesus. As one says,

WOW!!!!! This amazing message requires a 180-degree turn from the lessons we’ve been taught. Major prayer and contemplation is needed. But I do like much of what the author is saying.

I’m sure you do. But without the propitiation for our sins, Christ’s work on the cross means nothing. He’s just another victim of the system; a guy who said and did some cool things and maybe even beat death, but now we’re not so sure how or why.

It doesn’t matter what my opinion or your opinion is regarding the atonement. What does God Himself say? In Romans 3:25-26, He sums it up clearly:  “Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God.”

Peter Paul Rubens - The Crucified Christ - WGA...

Isaiah 53:5 points us to the coming Christ who was to die on the cross for our sins. The prophecy is very detailed, and the crucifixion happened just as it was foretold. “But he was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are healed.” Notice the substitution. Christ paid the price for us.

There are many more Bible verses about what Christ’s shed blood has done. Roll your mouse pointer over these verses and see for yourself:    Leviticus 17:11, 1 John 2:2, 1 Peter 2:24,  Revelation 5:9, Hebrews 9:12, 1 Timothy 2:6, Exodus 30:12-16, 1 Peter 3:18, Hebrews 9:22, Hebrews 9:7, Galatians 4:5.

Now then, having first equipped your mind with the breathed out truth of God’s Word, here is the article by Kimberly Knight that is being widely shared and applauded by those who would deconstruct the atonement:

See, I am the sort of Christian that is not theologically down with the whole subsitionary atonement thing – especially penal.

First of all is the deeply disturbing (and some would say heretical) idea of a God that would NEED a sacrifice of one innocent to pay for the sins of the rest of our sorry asses.  A blood thirsty God is frankly a warped vision of the Divine cast in our own vengeful image. Second is the more esoteric question of HOW exactly such a sacrifice would pay for “sins”?  There simply has been no answer to this question that I have encountered in my reading, praying, discerning life that satisfactorily answers this big fat how.

But about the Cross – we are not washed clean by his blood, we are convicted as a cruel and blind race that will execute our God when God comes to us as a poor man healing on the sabbath, overturning the worship of mammon in the temple, confronting the religious elite and and challenging the authority of the state.

We are not saved by the crucifixion, we are damned by it – or we could have been. Let us face that shameful dark day and accept our culpability – knowing that if Jesus returned today to preach the gospel to the poor, to proclaim release to the captives and recovery of sight to the blind, to set free those who are oppressed His blood would likely run in rivulets once again.  And let us move through that desolate Saturday knowing what we have done.  And let us arise on Easter surprised by Grace.

We can look to the empty tomb and know that we are redeemed by the forgiveness of a God who could have at any time saved himself from torture and an excruciating, humiliating death.  We are freed by a God that could have laid waste to a universe of weak and frightened creatures  who would whip, strip and nail their God to a cross to die the death of a criminal.  But that’s not how the story goes eh?  Our God suffers at our hands, allows us to mock and scorn the love offered, falls dead into our arms and goes willing to the tomb that we would seal for all time.  And then the most radical thing that a God can do happens – God emerges from the bonds of death, walks and talks with a woman and reveals the ultimate truth – God is Love. Jesus does not return to punish the world who had rejected him. Jesus emerges with wounded hands outstretched in love and forgiveness.

Here’s how Christian from another tribe says it.

“For me, the suffering of Jesus is a sacrament of the love of God. The story tells us that God willingly soaks up all of our systemic injustice,  personal evil and violence and returns only love.

So, God is no distant deity in some pure heaven far away. God is with us on earth in our horror, our terror, our violence, and our suffering. God refuses to add to the evil and violence, but instead responds with vulnerable, compassionate love. That’s how God wins. The resurrection of Jesus proclaims that love is more powerful than hate, compassion triumphs over oppression, and vulnerability overcomes power. Jesus invites us to put our trust in God, even in the face of horror, oppression, cruelty and death. God is with us. God feels and suffers deeply with us. And, what God does best is to bring life out of death.”

The Rev. Lowell E. Grisham
Rector, St. Paul’s Episcopal Church

As we work our way closer to the Cross this season I invite you to explore Christian theology that does not begin with a God that needs a blood sacrifice to settle the score.  I invite you to walk with a God that has shown us what true power looks like – love, compassion and forgiveness.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Berean Research Articles, Emergent Church, Progressive Christianity and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to The Left’s continued attack on atonement for sins

  1. Mr Davis says:

    The attonement, the shed blod, the nessesary death of the only innocent one, will make no sense to a man who thinks he is moral and good and can stand in the presense of God based on his own merit.

    Or such a one who thinks God can look past sin and not require the punishment due justice requires. For only if God were unjust could he look past sin and not require the due penalty be paid.

    Or such a one that doesn't see the one who he is sinning against. It is not some mere man he has rebelled against, but One who is Eternal, Infinite, Holy, Just, & Righteous, who alone is every man's creator.

    Logic alone says: If I offend one who will die, how long will the offense stand?

    Answer: Only as long as the offended party lives.

    Now apply this Logic to an eternal Infinate God. Would He not be eternally offended, Infinitely offended? Why do you think sin is sin in regards to God? Put murder on an infinate scale how does it measure against any other sin? Now if God who is eternal says your soul is eternal, now even in the death of the offender there is no hope of escape. Your soul will inherit a new body fit to endue whatever awaits you: heaven for those who are in Christ those He Himself justifies or The Lake of Fire for those who justify themselves who held onto falsehood as right.

    Hebrews 9:27 And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment:

    We have the example of blood feuds amongst people where the offense passes from generation to generation that gives us a resemblance of the problem of sin against and eternal God.

    May God bless you and keep you and may your hatred for sin in yourself Grow as you grow in the knowledge of God and drive you to deep remorse and break your heart over the lost who yet are in rebellion against a Holy Righteous God who is eternal, and Infinite, the Only Wise God.

    Like

  2. Theodore A. Jones says:

    "For it is not those who hear the law who are righteous in God's sight, but it is those who obey the law who will be declared righteous." Rom. 2:13 And the word law in his statement is not a referencing the OT written code.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s